To create the citation samples used for this study, we reran the search strategies that were developed for a systematic review on ward closure as an infection control practice in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and CINAHL from the database inception to Septem( Appendix, online only). It is possible for searchers to view this group and delete the duplicates.
ONLINE DUPLICATE DETECTOR SOFTWARE
Specifically, the authors examined and compared two categories of de-duplication strategies: de-duplicating in the Ovid and EBSCO database platforms and de-duplicating in three selected reference management software packages: RefWorks, EndNote, and Mendeley.Įndnote: When de-duplicating, this citation manager creates a separate group for duplicate references only. The aim of this study was to explore and compare the effectiveness of various de-duplication features. Removing these duplicate citations, also known as de-duplication, can be a time-consuming process but is necessary to ensure a valid and reliable pool of studies for inclusion in a systematic review. As Kassirer and Angell argued, “multiple reports of the same observations can over emphasize the importance of the findings, overburden busy reviewers, fill the medical literature with inconsequential material, and distort the academic reward system”. In addition, although many have called out against such practice, some authors “slice, reformat, or reproduce material from a study”, which creates repetitive, duplicate, and redundant publications. Also, due to the nature of the publishing cycle in the field of medicine, conference abstracts and full-text articles reporting the same information are often retrieved concurrently. Searching multiple databases, however, results in the retrieval of numerous duplicate citations. The Cochrane Collaboration, for example, places a heavy emphasis on minimizing bias with a thorough, objective, and reproducible multi-database search, which has become the standard in systematic review processes. Because they are used as the foundation for clinical and policy-related decision-making processes, it is critical to ensure that the methods used in systematic reviews are explicit and valid. Therefore, it’s essential to get your hands on a useful companion, the online plagiarism checker, to detect and remove plagiarism before publishing your work.Systematic reviews continue to gain prevalence in health care primarily because they summarize and appraise vast amounts of evidence for busy health care providers. On the other hand, the sites containing plagiarized text can face deindexing from search results. Search engines provide a higher rank to pages with unique content. The ranking of web pages on search engine result pages is highly reliant on the quality of content they contain. Besides academics, plagiarism is a great nuisance for people working in the online world. However, it is considered an ethical offense by academic institutes. Logically, plagiarism is not a crime in the books of law that needs to be punished in court. Even rewriting your own published works also comes under the category of plagiarism. Most of the institutes regard plagiarism as academic dishonesty that is subject to severe consequences, such as grade failure penalties or expulsion from the institute. On a broader term, if you will use anything that is not your own creation, it will be considered plagiarized, and you can face legal consequences due to it. Plagiarism is defined as the act of stealing another author’s ideas, thoughts, words, or expressions and publishing them under your own name.
0 kommentar(er)
